The reproducibility project

Posted on Updated on


Thanks to Anne Pier Salverda who made me aware of this project to replicate all studies in certain psych journals, including APA journals that publish psycholinguistic work, such as JEP:LMC. This might be a fine April fools joke slightly delayed, but it sure is a great idea! In a similar study researchers apparently found that 6 out of 53 cancer studies replicated (see linked article).

And while we are at it, here’s an article that, if followed, is guaranteed to increase the proportion of replications (whereas power, effect sizes, lower p-values, family-wise error corrections, min-F and all the other favorites out there are pretty much guaranteed to not do the job). Simmons et al 2011, published in Psychological Science, shows what we should all know but that is all too often forgotten or belittled: lax criteria in excluding data, adding additional subjects, transforming data, adding or removing covariates inflate the Type I error rate (in combination easily up to over 80% false negatives for p<.05!!!).  Enjoy.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “The reproducibility project

    Robin Melnick said:
    April 18, 2012 at 7:37 pm

    Nope, no April Fool’s joke…I’m working on one of the replications right now. (Wait, maybe the joke’s on me!)

    Like

      tiflo said:
      April 18, 2012 at 7:41 pm

      Nice! I would even love this if they rejected one of my findings. Have you read the Simmons et al article? I think at least 50% of the people in the field do the things that they write about.

      Like

Questions? Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s