GAIN, the press, and “brain drain” ;)

Posted on Updated on

I recently visited the GAIN meeting in Cambridge, MA, where about 200-300 German academics met to get information on and discuss the recent reform(s) of the German university system, brain drain (away from Germany), how to reverse it, how to allow young researchers to conduct independent research, etc. Representatives from all major research and education funding institutions (DFG, Alexander von Humboldt, DAAD), members of the parliament, deans from several universities, representatives from independent research foundations (MPI, Frauenhoffer, etc.), and industry representatives gave presentations about recent improvements, persistence problems, and plans for the future. There were also many interesting workshops on, for example, how to start your own lab and how to apply for funding for it (“Nachwuchsgruppe”) or, more generally, on academic and non-academic careers in different disciplines.

If you’re interested in more information, have a look at the GAIN website, which contains the whole program, contact info, and so on. A summaries of the meeting is available, for example, at the site of the German Scholar Organization (GSO). The event also had quite some press echo (see this GAIN summary of the press echo, e.g.,  Stuttgarter Zeitung (in German) –which also “quotes” utterances of me out of context ;), so pls take that one with a grain of salt, make that a bucket full of salt– or Martin Fenner’s blog; I am sure there is more).

My one paragraph summary would be that the situation seems to have improved a lot and that most involved parties in Germany (DFG, the universities, politicians, …) are aware that these changes need to continue. I was good to hear from young researchers that have decided to start there careers in Germany that they are able to conduct their research independently. At the same time, there still are some oddities about the current state of affairs – for example, in some states, “Junior Professors” (young professors, roughly comparable to an associate professor) are not allowed to graduate students because they aren’t “habilitiert”. That is, their doctoral students must take the final examination (Promotion) with a senior colleague of the Junior Professor. Also, it seems that start-up funds are still not comparable with those at top US universities, but IMHO start-up funding is quite essential in that it allows young researchers to conduct their own research without in any way depending on their senior colleagues (well, obviously there is always gonna be influence from senior colleagues and that is good and fair, but financial independence is an important component).

There is much more to be said, but in any case, if you’re a German scholar in the US or a scholar interesting in working in Germany, I think you may be interested in reading up on the recent changes to the German university system and the GAIN website given above is a great starting point for that (check out the GAIN newsletter archive).


One thought on “GAIN, the press, and “brain drain” ;)

    Shravan Vasishth said:
    October 29, 2008 at 1:20 am

    I’m not German, but I have been in the system since 2002. Until recently I was a Juniorprofessor, I held that position for four years. It was intended to be a US style tenure track thing, but it was implemented as a “you have 6 years and then it’s over”. I did get tenure, but that was not part of the JP process, I applied for another position in my own dept.

    Having come out of the US system (OSU, PhD 2002), my experience with the JP and the German system is that the real problem is the feudal style of full professors in Germany. There is a sense of “empire” (this is my area, that is your area) and JPs didn’t (at least in my time) seemed to have the status given to full professors (i.e., they are not really treated like equals). I think that’s the real problem in Germany: this sense of empire-building that professorships come with. It’s hard to change all that with institutional level reform. I don’t really know the solution to this, jus pointing out what I see as the central barrier to a successful US style academic system.


Questions? Thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s